# Agilescreen

*/Startups/Agilescreen*

## Startup Overview

This continuous compliance engine intercepts code changes at the commit level to enforce regulatory frameworks in real-time. It evaluates every pull request and code modification directly within the developer workflow. Rather than waiting for a periodic audit, engineering teams see immediately if a newly introduced feature violates a specific security or privacy control.

Software engineering and compliance teams use the platform to close the gap between rapid deployment and strict regulatory requirements. Traditional compliance workflows rely on manual audits or post-deployment posture checks that catch violations only after the software is shipped. By shifting the evaluation to the commit phase, the system prevents non-compliant code from merging into the main branch and exposing the business to a regulatory breach.

While platforms like Vanta and Drata monitor cloud infrastructure configurations or rely on periodic evidence collection, this system evaluates the actual codebase dynamically. Every scan is fully commit-triggered and automatically mapped to specific regulatory control requirements. This architecture translates abstract compliance mandates into concrete, immediate checks for developers writing the code.

## Startup Founding Hypothesis

**Approach**: that evaluates code commits against regulatory frameworks in real-time
**Competitors**:
- [Vanta](/Competitors/Vanta)
- [Drata](/Competitors/Drata)
- [Manual compliance audits](/Competitors/Manual_compliance_audits)
**Differentiator2x2**: fully commit-triggered and automatically mapped to specific regulatory control requirements

## Startup Solution Coordinate

**Solution**: [Commit Compliance Engine](/Software/Commit_Compliance_Engine)

## Startup Position2x2

```mermaid
quadrantChart
x-axis Periodic Assessment --> Commit-Triggered Evaluation
y-axis Manual Evidence Gathering --> Automated Control Mapping
quadrant-1 Continuous Assurance
quadrant-2 Point-in-time Automation
quadrant-3 Manual Overhead
quadrant-4 Continuous Manual
Agilescreen: [0.85, 0.90]
Drata: [0.40, 0.85]
Vanta: [0.30, 0.80]
Manual compliance audits: [0.10, 0.15]
```

## Startup Offer

**Proof**:
- Targeting a 90% reduction in engineering hours spent on manual audit evidence collection.
- Aiming for zero compliance-blocking regressions introduced into production branches.
- Designed to format code-level evidence identically to standard AICPA and ISO auditor requests.
**Tiers**:
- Name: Single Framework · Price: ~$400–$800/mo · Inclusions: Real-time commit evaluation against 1 regulatory framework (e.g., SOC 2), up to 50 active code contributors, and standard auditor report exports.
- Name: Multi-Framework · Price: ~$1,200–$2,000/mo · Inclusions: Simultaneous commit evaluation against up to 3 frameworks (e.g., SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA), up to 150 active contributors, and custom control mapping.
- Name: Enterprise Controls · Price: enterprise: ~$30k–$60k/yr · Inclusions: Unlimited regulatory frameworks, custom internal policy ingestion, unlimited contributors, and dedicated integration support for legacy version control systems.
**Guarantee**: If a third-party auditor rejects an Agilescreen-mapped control log, we will manually extract and compile the required commit evidence for that control at no additional cost.
**Business Function**: ProvideService
**Objection Handlers**:
- Objection: We already use a compliance platform like Vanta. Rebuttal: Traditional platforms scan infrastructure and endpoints; Agilescreen evaluates the actual code commits to catch violations before deployment.
- Objection: Analyzing every commit will slow down our CI/CD pipelines. Rebuttal: The system evaluates commits asynchronously via webhooks, adding zero latency to active build and deploy paths.
- Objection: Auditors will not accept automated commit logs. Rebuttal: The platform is specifically designed to tag and map every commit directly to standard AICPA and ISO control requirements in standard formats.
- Objection: We cannot grant third-party access to our proprietary source code. Rebuttal: The engine is designed to parse diff signatures and commit metadata, never requiring a full clone of your codebase.
**Pricing Architecture**: Tiered
**Agent Checkout Support**:
- agentic-commerce-protocol

## Startup Brand

**Voice**: Authoritative technical register emphasizing uncompromising precision and strict regulatory adherence.
**Tagline**: Map every code commit directly to regulatory compliance controls.
**Icon Concept**: turnstile
**Palette Intent**: institutional-cool
**Visual Identity**: A highly structured layout utilizing slate gray and ice blue paired with dense monospaced data tables communicates forensic certainty.
**Archetype Reference**: the-ruler

## Startup Buyer Chain

**Chain**: Agilescreen → DevSecOps Engineer → Compliance Officer → External Auditor
**Gtm Motion**: Acquires initial usage through self-serve installations of CI/CD pipeline plugins by engineering leads seeking to unblock pull requests. Expands accounts by selling aggregate organization-wide visibility and automated control mapping to the Chief Information Security Officer or dedicated compliance team.
**Agent Channel**: Designed to register in the GitHub Copilot Extensions registry and the OpenAI tool directory, enabling automated developer agents and compliance bots to autonomously verify if proposed code changes violate mapped regulatory controls before committing.
**Primary Channel**: Targets developer ecosystem surfaces like the GitHub Marketplace and GitLab Integration directory, discovered when platform engineers search for commit-triggered compliance validation or SOC 2 pipeline guardrails.

## Startup Customer Journey

```mermaid
flowchart LR; A[GitHub Marketplace] --> B[DevSecOps Engineer]; B --> C[CI/CD Pipeline Plugin]; C --> D[Unblocked Pull Request]; D --> E[Compliance Officer]; E --> F[Multi-Framework Tier]; F --> G[External Auditor];
```

## Startup Proof Points

_Illustrative — target and order-of-magnitude estimate figures, not an achieved track record (this Thing is concept-stage)._

**Pilot Goals**:
- A 30-day single-framework pilot tracking up to 50 active contributors, aiming to prove that commits accurately map to SOC 2 controls without any measurable CI/CD pipeline slowdowns.
- A 60-day multi-framework pilot in a regulated environment, aiming to ingest custom internal policies and accurately flag compliance violations in diff signatures prior to deployment.
**Target Metrics**:
- target: 90% reduction in engineering hours spent on manual audit evidence collection
- target: 0 compliance-blocking regressions introduced into production branches
- aim: zero latency added to active build and deploy paths via asynchronous webhook evaluation
- aim: 100% acceptance rate of formatted code-level evidence by third-party AICPA and ISO auditors
**Target Case Studies**:
- A mid-market fintech VP of Engineering replacing manual ticket linking with automated webhook-based commit evaluations to gather SOC 2 evidence without engineering overhead.
- A growth-stage healthtech Compliance Officer preventing PHI-handling code regressions from reaching production branches while maintaining zero latency in the active CI/CD pipeline.
- An enterprise SaaS DevSecOps Lead mapping multi-framework compliance across thousands of weekly commits without granting full repository clone access to a third-party vendor.
**Testimonial Targets**:
- A VP of Engineering praising how asynchronous commit evaluation eliminates manual compliance work while adding zero latency to the team's build paths.
- A Chief Information Security Officer validating the security benefit of gathering SOC 2 evidence using diff signatures without granting full source code access.
- An External IT Auditor confirming that automated commit logs precisely match standard AICPA format requirements and accelerate the audit review process.

## Startup Top Risks

**Risks**:
- Severity: existential · Description: Auditors refuse to accept commit-level automated mappings as valid evidence for compliance certification. · Mitigation Status: in-progress
- Severity: high · Description: High false-positive rates in commit evaluations block developer workflows and cause engineering teams to rip out the tool. · Mitigation Status: in-progress
- Severity: high · Description: Incumbents like Vanta or Drata build continuous integration commit-scanning features that neutralize the core differentiator. · Mitigation Status: unmitigated
- Severity: moderate · Description: Maintaining up-to-date code mappings for constantly changing global regulatory frameworks drains core engineering resources. · Mitigation Status: unmitigated

## Startup Competitors

- [Vanta](/Competitors/Vanta) — Incumbent Platform
- [Drata](/Competitors/Drata) — Incumbent Platform
- [Manual Compliance Audits](/Competitors/Manual_Compliance_Audits) — Status Quo
- [Secureframe](/Competitors/Secureframe) — Incumbent Platform
- [Open Policy Agent](/Competitors/Open_Policy_Agent) — Policy As Code

## Startup Solution Stack

- [Audit Reporting Service](/Services/Audit_Reporting_Service) — Service-as-Software
- [Commit Evaluation Agent](/Agents/Commit_Evaluation_Agent) — Agent
- [Framework Mapping Agent](/Agents/Framework_Mapping_Agent) — Agent
- [Control Verification Engine](/Software/Control_Verification_Engine) — Software
- [Repository Webhook API](/Software/Repository_Webhook_API) — Software

## Startup Story Brand

**Hero**:
- **Need**: to be the organization's technical steward, not a collector of audit evidence
- **Want**: to ship product without compliance audits stalling every production release
- **Identity**: the engineering leader at a regulated software company
**Plan**:
- Step: Select frameworks · Detail: Choose SOC 2, ISO 27001, or HIPAA to begin automated monitoring across your repositories.
- Step: Validate commits · Detail: Agilescreen analyzes each commit asynchronously via webhooks, mapping diff signatures to your specific regulatory control requirements.
- Step: Export evidence · Detail: Generate auditor-ready reports formatted exactly to AICPA and ISO standards for immediate third-party review.
**Guide**:
- **Empathy**: Does your SOC 2 process still drain engineering velocity through manual evidence collection?
**Problem**:
- **Villain**: manual compliance audits
- **External**: collecting evidence for SOC 2 or HIPAA takes weeks of manual GitHub history exports and spreadsheet mapping
- **Internal**: you feel like an administrative assistant chasing developers for commit logs instead of shipping code
- **Philosophical**: Engineering talent belongs in product development, not in manual evidence gathering.
**Success**: Audit evidence generates itself with every commit, keeping your SOC 2 or HIPAA posture deployment-ready with zero manual mapping.
**One Liner**: Manual evidence collection costs engineering teams weeks of high-velocity development. Agilescreen evaluates code commits against regulatory frameworks in real-time so teams ship compliant code by default.
**Positioning**:
- **So That**: automatically map every code commit directly to regulatory control requirements
- **Unlike**: Vanta and Drata
- **For Whom**: engineering leaders at regulated software companies
- **Category**: Automated Code-Level Compliance for Software Teams
**Call To Action**:
- **Direct**: Connect GitHub repository
- **Transitional**: View sample control report
**Failure Stakes**:
- Weeks of engineering time lost to manual evidence collection
- Delayed product launches due to compliance blocking
- Security regressions that void your certification status
**Transformation**:
- **To**: the engineering organization's compliance-ready leader
- **From**: the developer digging through GitHub history for auditors
**Controlling Idea**: Compliance documentation should be an automated byproduct of the development process.

## Startup Token Hero

**Genre**: founding-hypothesis
**Rendered**: Manual evidence collection costs engineering teams weeks of high-velocity development. Agilescreen evaluates code commits against regulatory frameworks in real-time so teams ship compliant code by default.
**Mechanism**: spine-derived-v1
**Template Id**: spine-founding-hypothesis
**Vocab Fingerprint**: 08c5ed962f24ccd3

## Startup Token Positioning

**Genre**: moore-positioning
**Rendered**: Automated Code-Level Compliance for Software Teams for engineering leaders at regulated software companies. Unlike Vanta and Drata — automatically map every code commit directly to regulatory control requirements.
**Mechanism**: spine-derived-v1
**Template Id**: spine-moore-positioning
**Vocab Fingerprint**: 617241092b731e9d

## Startup Token Pitch Deck

**Genre**: pitch-deck
**Rendered**: Problem: collecting evidence for SOC 2 or HIPAA takes weeks of manual GitHub history exports and spreadsheet mapping
Solution: Manual evidence collection costs engineering teams weeks of high-velocity development. Agilescreen evaluates code commits against regulatory frameworks in real-time so teams ship compliant code by default.
Customer: engineering leaders at regulated software companies
Unlike: Vanta and Drata
**Mechanism**: spine-derived-v1
**Template Id**: spine-pitch-deck
**Vocab Fingerprint**: ed7c6e9ed3b0c3ae

## Startup Token M E D D P I C C

**Pain**: collecting evidence for SOC 2 or HIPAA takes weeks of manual GitHub history exports and spreadsheet mapping
**Metrics**: Target: Audit evidence generates itself with every commit, keeping your SOC 2 or HIPAA posture deployment-ready with zero manual mapping.
**Rendered**: Pain: collecting evidence for SOC 2 or HIPAA takes weeks of manual GitHub history exports and spreadsheet mapping
Economic buyer: DevSecOps Engineer
Metrics: Target: Audit evidence generates itself with every commit, keeping your SOC 2 or HIPAA posture deployment-ready with zero manual mapping.
Competition: Vanta and Drata
**Mechanism**: spine-derived-v1
**Competition**: Vanta and Drata
**Economic Buyer**: DevSecOps Engineer
**Vocab Fingerprint**: 491618be32459ab0

## Startup Token Cold Email

**Genre**: cold-email
**Rendered**: Subject: Automated Code-Level Compliance for Software Teams for engineering leaders at regulated software companies

engineering leaders at regulated software companies — collecting evidence for SOC 2 or HIPAA takes weeks of manual GitHub history exports and spreadsheet mapping Manual evidence collection costs engineering teams weeks of high-velocity development. Agilescreen evaluates code commits against regulatory frameworks in real-time so teams ship compliant code by default.
**Mechanism**: spine-derived-v1
**Template Id**: spine-cold-email
**Vocab Fingerprint**: c4dd74af6588d052

## Startup Token Agent Spec

**Genre**: ai-agent-spec
**Rendered**: Automated Code-Level Compliance for Software Teams. Manual evidence collection costs engineering teams weeks of high-velocity development. Agilescreen evaluates code commits against regulatory frameworks in real-time so teams ship compliant code by default. Serves engineering leaders at regulated software companies.
**Mechanism**: spine-derived-v1
**Template Id**: spine-ai-agent-spec
**Vocab Fingerprint**: 884880cc2d6770cf

## Neighborhood

### Candidate solutions

- [Untangle Intercompany Eliminations](/Problems/Untangle_Intercompany_Eliminations) — candidate solution for · Problems

### What it offers

- [Ledger Offset](/Services/Ledger_Offset) — offers · Services
- [Ledger Prism](/Services/Ledger_Prism) — offers · Services
- [Commit Compliance Engine](/Software/Commit_Compliance_Engine) — offers · Software

### Composed of

- [Consolidated Ledger Service](/Services/Consolidated_Ledger_Service) — composes · Services
- [Variance Resolution Agent](/Agents/Variance_Resolution_Agent) — composes · Agents
- [Ledger Normalization Engine](/Software/Ledger_Normalization_Engine) — composes · Software
- [Semantic Matching Worker](/Agents/Semantic_Matching_Worker) — composes · Agents
- [Transaction Vector SDK](/Software/Transaction_Vector_SDK) — composes · Software
- [Trial Balance Ingestion API](/Software/Trial_Balance_Ingestion_API) — composes · Software
- [Elimination Schedule Service](/Services/Elimination_Schedule_Service) — composes · Services
- [Ledger Reconciliation Agent](/Agents/Ledger_Reconciliation_Agent) — composes · Agents
- [Exchange Variance Worker](/Agents/Exchange_Variance_Worker) — composes · Agents
- [Semantic Matching Engine](/Software/Semantic_Matching_Engine) — composes · Software
- [Audit Reporting Service](/Services/Audit_Reporting_Service) — composes · Services
- [Commit Evaluation Agent](/Agents/Commit_Evaluation_Agent) — composes · Agents
- [Framework Mapping Agent](/Agents/Framework_Mapping_Agent) — composes · Agents
- [Control Verification Engine](/Software/Control_Verification_Engine) — composes · Software
- [Repository Webhook API](/Software/Repository_Webhook_API) — composes · Software

### Embodies

- [Service-as-Software](/Theses/Service-as-Software) — embodies · Theses
- [Software](/Theses/Software) — embodies · Theses

### Competitors

- [Microsoft Excel](/Competitors/Microsoft_Excel) — competes with · Competitors
- [Caseware Working Papers](/Competitors/Caseware_Working_Papers) — competes with · Competitors
- [BlackLine](/Competitors/BlackLine) — competes with · Competitors
- [Manual Excel VLOOKUPs](/Competitors/Manual_Excel_VLOOKUPs) — competes with · Competitors
- [manual Excel matching](/Competitors/manual_Excel_matching) — competes with · Competitors
- [Caseware](/Competitors/Caseware) — competes with · Competitors
- [manual Excel macros](/Competitors/manual_Excel_macros) — competes with · Competitors
- [BlackLine Financial Close](/Competitors/BlackLine_Financial_Close) — competes with · Competitors
- [Manual Excel workbooks](/Competitors/Manual_Excel_workbooks) — competes with · Competitors
- [Manual VLOOKUP Matching](/Competitors/Manual_VLOOKUP_Matching) — competes with · Competitors
- [BlackLine Consolidation](/Competitors/BlackLine_Consolidation) — competes with · Competitors
- [BlackLine Solutions](/Competitors/BlackLine_Solutions) — competes with · Competitors
- [manual spreadsheet diffs](/Competitors/manual_spreadsheet_diffs) — competes with · Competitors
- [Manual Spreadsheet Diffing](/Competitors/Manual_Spreadsheet_Diffing) — competes with · Competitors
- [manual Excel mapping](/Competitors/manual_Excel_mapping) — competes with · Competitors
- [Manual Spreadsheet Macros](/Competitors/Manual_Spreadsheet_Macros) — competes with · Competitors
- [BlackLine Account Reconciliations](/Competitors/BlackLine_Account_Reconciliations) — competes with · Competitors
- [BlackLine Close Management](/Competitors/BlackLine_Close_Management) — competes with · Competitors
- [BlackLine Mapping Rules](/Competitors/BlackLine_Mapping_Rules) — competes with · Competitors
- [Manual VLOOKUPs](/Competitors/Manual_VLOOKUPs) — competes with · Competitors
- [Manual Excel Spreadsheets](/Competitors/Manual_Excel_Spreadsheets) — competes with · Competitors
- [manual spreadsheet VLOOKUPs](/Competitors/manual_spreadsheet_VLOOKUPs) — competes with · Competitors
- [Drata](/Competitors/Drata) — competes with · Competitors
- [Vanta](/Competitors/Vanta) — competes with · Competitors
- [Secureframe](/Competitors/Secureframe) — competes with · Competitors
- [Open Policy Agent](/Competitors/Open_Policy_Agent) — competes with · Competitors
- [Manual Compliance Audits](/Competitors/Manual_Compliance_Audits) — competes with · Competitors

### Who it serves

- [Accounting Firm](/CompanyTypes/Accounting_Firm) — serves · CompanyTypes

### Similar Startups

- [Abide](/Startups/Abide) — similar · Startups
- [Logicguideline](/Startups/Logicguideline) — similar · Startups
- [Autonomousfidelity](/Startups/Autonomousfidelity) — similar · Startups
- [Choruild](/Startups/Choruild) — similar · Startups
- [Compole](/Startups/Compole) — similar · Startups
- [Attestationmaze](/Startups/Attestationmaze) — similar · Startups
- [Validatyard](/Startups/Validatyard) — similar · Startups
- [Commitside](/Startups/Commitside) — similar · Startups
- [Auduard](/Startups/Auduard) — similar · Startups
- [Regecurity](/Startups/Regecurity) — similar · Startups
- [Compiotech](/Startups/Compiotech) — similar · Startups
- [Auditcode](/Startups/Auditcode) — similar · Startups
- [Sociment](/Startups/Sociment) — similar · Startups
- [Rulescope](/Startups/Rulescope) — similar · Startups
- [Accendor](/Startups/Accendor) — similar · Startups
- [Assurancepivot](/Startups/Assurancepivot) — similar · Startups
- [Anchorhaven](/CompanyTypes/B2B_SaaS_Companies/Startups/Anchorhaven) — similar · Startups
- [AuditLens Engine](/Startups/AuditLens_Engine) — similar · Startups
- [Valel](/Startups/Valel) — similar · Startups
- [Attategic](/Startups/Attategic) — similar · Startups