Opportunities
AI Brady Discovery for Prosecutors
Connected through 6 “incumbent in” links.
Structure
Opportunities
Opportunities
Connected through 6 “incumbent in” links.
Structure
Sized prize
IllustrativeIllustrative targets and order-of-magnitude estimates — not an achieved track record. This Thing is concept-stage; real figures come from live data once operating.
SAM
~$200-300M targeting mid-to-large metropolitan District Attorney and US Attorney offices
SOM
~$15-30M
TAM
~3,000 US state, local, and federal prosecutor offices × ~$150k/yr average discovery software spend ≈ $450M
Growth Rate
~12-18%/yr, driven by the exponential explosion of digital case evidence compounding Brady compliance risks
Paid Comparable Spend
Typically ~$100k-500k/yr per office spent on paralegal overtime, contract document reviewers, and legacy eDiscovery platforms to manually screen bodycam footage and phone dumps
Market sizing
How you know
Kill Thresholds
Leading Metrics
What Proves Right
Prosecutors upload bodycam footage and phone extraction files to the system and review automated exculpatory evidence flags within four hours. Mid-sized DA offices convert 30-day pilots into paid annual contracts at the $150,000 price point. Weekly active usage among trial attorneys exceeds 75% as they export the generated disclosure logs directly into case files.
What Proves Wrong
Trial teams reject the automated flags because missing a single piece of exculpatory evidence carries career-ending malpractice risks. The engine generates a false positive rate above 40%, forcing paralegals to spend more time clearing bad flags than they would manually reviewing the raw files. Municipal IT departments block deployment due to hard blockers on cloud-based CJIS compliance.
Win conditions